+213.6%
LNG vs HTZ
-94.4%
+308.0%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -2.6% | +2.4% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +11.3% | -8.5% | +19.9% | +11.6% |
| 30D | +10.6% | -18.9% | +29.6% | +11.3% |
| 3M | +16.1% | -36.0% | +52.2% | +17.7% |
| 6M | +29.6% | -74.6% | +104.1% | +35.1% |
| YTD | +60.3% | -70.8% | +131.1% | +65.1% |
| 1Y | +46.1% | -75.3% | +121.4% | +51.6% |
| 3Y | +85.9% | -81.6% | +167.5% | +90.2% |
| All | +213.6% | -94.4% | +308.0% | +258.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling