+67.3%
LNG vs HTZ
-82.6%
+149.9%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -8.4% | +7.8% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -15.9% | -14.6% | -1.3% | -15.7% |
| 30D | +2.1% | -20.8% | +22.9% | +2.4% |
| 3M | +4.8% | -18.8% | +23.6% | +5.0% |
| 6M | +6.8% | -74.7% | +81.5% | +8.4% |
| YTD | +44.0% | -68.1% | +112.1% | +45.3% |
| 1Y | +34.9% | -73.5% | +108.4% | +36.6% |
| 3Y | +67.3% | -81.8% | +149.1% | +67.5% |
| All | +67.3% | -82.6% | +149.9% | +67.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling