+86.4%
LNG vs HTZ
-81.9%
+168.3%
-24.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -6.1% | +7.7% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +10.9% | -14.0% | +24.9% | +11.1% |
| 30D | +8.1% | -19.8% | +27.9% | +8.3% |
| 3M | +15.7% | -45.0% | +60.7% | +16.4% |
| 6M | +27.2% | -73.2% | +100.5% | +29.0% |
| YTD | +60.7% | -70.0% | +130.7% | +62.2% |
| 1Y | +46.3% | -75.7% | +122.0% | +48.3% |
| All | +86.4% | -81.9% | +168.3% | +85.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling