+42.6%
LNG vs HTZ
-60.6%
+103.3%
-24.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.2% | +9.2% | -15.3% | -5.9% |
| 7D | -1.9% | +18.9% | -20.9% | -1.6% |
| 30D | +6.2% | +26.3% | -20.0% | +6.7% |
| 3M | +13.7% | +49.7% | -35.9% | +14.9% |
| 6M | +7.5% | -61.1% | +68.6% | +5.5% |
| YTD | +51.3% | -56.0% | +107.3% | +50.4% |
| 1Y | +42.6% | -66.4% | +109.1% | +39.2% |
| All | +42.6% | -60.6% | +103.3% | +39.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling