+99.9%
LMT vs ENTG
-0.3%
+100.1%
-31.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -3.8% | +2.5% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +5.1% | +15.2% | -10.1% | +5.1% |
| 30D | +14.1% | -3.6% | +17.8% | +14.1% |
| 3M | +0.3% | -10.0% | +10.2% | +0.3% |
| 6M | +16.1% | +1.8% | +14.3% | +15.7% |
| YTD | +25.5% | +75.5% | -50.0% | +23.8% |
| 1Y | +34.1% | +82.4% | -48.3% | +32.3% |
| 3Y | +45.1% | +58.5% | -13.4% | +41.6% |
| All | +99.9% | -0.3% | +100.1% | +90.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling