+35.1%
LMT vs ENTG
+48.2%
-13.1%
-31.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | +1.4% | -3.6% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +8.9% | -10.3% | -1.2% |
| 30D | -12.5% | -0.8% | -11.7% | -12.5% |
| 3M | -0.5% | +6.6% | -7.0% | -0.9% |
| 6M | -20.0% | +22.1% | -42.1% | -20.6% |
| YTD | +10.4% | +70.2% | -59.8% | +9.3% |
| 1Y | +17.7% | +76.7% | -59.0% | +16.7% |
| All | +35.1% | +48.2% | -13.1% | +32.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling