-19.9%
LMT vs ARMK
+39.1%
-59.0%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -0.9% | -0.6% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -6.3% | -2.4% | -3.9% | -6.1% |
| 30D | -8.5% | 0.0% | -8.5% | -8.4% |
| 3M | +1.8% | +6.7% | -4.8% | +1.1% |
| 6M | -19.9% | +38.8% | -58.8% | -22.7% |
| All | -19.9% | +39.1% | -59.0% | -22.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling