+46.9%
LMT vs ARMK
+100.8%
-53.9%
-31.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | -0.9% | +3.5% | +2.6% |
| 7D | -5.6% | -0.7% | -4.9% | -5.6% |
| 30D | +18.4% | -1.3% | +19.7% | +18.3% |
| 3M | +0.6% | -2.5% | +3.1% | +0.6% |
| 6M | +20.6% | +20.8% | -0.2% | +19.2% |
| YTD | +27.0% | +48.2% | -21.2% | +23.8% |
| 1Y | +36.9% | +45.7% | -8.9% | +33.6% |
| 3Y | +46.9% | +96.6% | -49.7% | +37.8% |
| All | +46.9% | +100.8% | -53.9% | +37.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling