-92.6%
LCID vs NIO
-64.6%
-28.0%
-92.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -1.6% | +3.3% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -6.6% | -13.0% | +6.5% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -30.1% | -18.3% | -11.9% | -24.4% |
| 3M | -17.6% | -33.2% | +15.6% | -3.2% |
| 6M | -54.4% | -21.5% | -32.9% | -50.7% |
| YTD | -55.7% | -25.5% | -30.2% | -51.4% |
| 1Y | -71.0% | -38.0% | -33.0% | -66.7% |
| All | -92.6% | -64.6% | -28.0% | -90.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling