-78.4%
LCID vs NIO
-53.4%
-25.0%
-82.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | -1.2% | -1.4% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +8.9% | -1.8% | +10.7% | +9.9% |
| 30D | +6.8% | -6.6% | +13.5% | +10.3% |
| 3M | -45.2% | -29.9% | -15.4% | -36.4% |
| 6M | -39.1% | -46.6% | +7.5% | -22.7% |
| YTD | -65.3% | -36.5% | -28.8% | -59.3% |
| 1Y | -78.4% | -51.1% | -27.3% | -70.3% |
| All | -78.4% | -53.4% | -25.0% | -70.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling