-74.9%
LCID vs NIO
-37.4%
-37.5%
-81.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -0.3% | -0.8% | -1.0% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -6.7% | +8.4% | +4.0% |
| 30D | -34.2% | -20.0% | -14.2% | -29.1% |
| 3M | -9.1% | -30.5% | +21.3% | +2.0% |
| 6M | -52.6% | -20.7% | -31.9% | -49.0% |
| YTD | -56.2% | -25.7% | -30.5% | -52.4% |
| 1Y | -74.9% | -38.6% | -36.3% | -70.1% |
| All | -74.9% | -37.4% | -37.5% | -70.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling