-97.6%
LCID vs ARMK
+144.6%
-242.3%
-99.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -0.9% | +2.6% | +2.4% |
| 7D | -6.6% | -2.4% | -4.2% | -5.0% |
| 30D | -30.1% | 0.0% | -30.2% | -30.5% |
| 3M | -17.6% | +6.7% | -24.3% | -22.2% |
| 6M | -54.4% | +38.8% | -93.2% | -64.8% |
| YTD | -55.7% | +55.2% | -110.9% | -68.8% |
| 1Y | -71.0% | +46.6% | -117.7% | -78.7% |
| 3Y | -92.6% | +112.9% | -205.5% | -96.2% |
| All | -97.6% | +144.6% | -242.3% | -98.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling