-95.3%
LCID vs ARMK
+204.2%
-299.5%
-99.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +1.4% | -2.5% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +1.8% | +1.7% | +0.1% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -34.2% | +3.1% | -37.4% | -35.5% |
| 3M | -9.1% | +9.2% | -18.4% | -14.2% |
| 6M | -52.6% | +43.7% | -96.3% | -61.9% |
| YTD | -56.2% | +57.4% | -113.6% | -66.8% |
| 1Y | -74.9% | +51.9% | -126.7% | -80.5% |
| 3Y | -92.1% | +125.4% | -217.5% | -95.2% |
| 5Y | -97.6% | +149.1% | -246.6% | -98.5% |
| All | -95.3% | +204.2% | -299.5% | -97.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling