+138.2%
IBM vs ARES
+83.4%
+54.9%
-37.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARES | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +0.2% | -1.0% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +4.5% | -9.5% | -6.0% |
| 30D | +11.1% | +15.7% | -4.6% | +7.2% |
| 3M | +5.7% | -2.0% | +7.7% | +6.0% |
| 6M | +10.1% | +10.4% | -0.3% | +7.1% |
| YTD | -15.6% | -14.2% | -1.4% | -13.9% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | -7.8% | -11.8% | -19.2% |
| 3Y | +80.4% | +41.4% | +39.0% | +64.2% |
| All | +138.2% | +83.4% | +54.9% | +96.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARES.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARES return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARES return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARES wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling