-21.6%
IBM vs ARES
+13.0%
-34.6%
-32.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ARES | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.0% | +1.0% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -1.7% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
| 30D | +0.3% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
| 3M | -21.6% | +8.5% | -30.1% | -22.6% |
| All | -21.6% | +13.0% | -34.6% | -22.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARES.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARES return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARES return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARES wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling