-20.1%
HUT vs NIO
-92.4%
+72.3%
-94.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.6% | -1.2% | +8.8% | +8.1% |
| 7D | +24.8% | -1.8% | +26.6% | +26.1% |
| 30D | -28.4% | -6.6% | -21.7% | -25.9% |
| 3M | -31.2% | -29.9% | -1.4% | -18.7% |
| 6M | -40.2% | -46.6% | +6.4% | -20.1% |
| YTD | +32.9% | -36.5% | +69.4% | +60.2% |
| 1Y | +39.1% | -51.1% | +90.2% | +89.4% |
| 3Y | +462.8% | -55.2% | +518.0% | +582.5% |
| All | -20.1% | -92.4% | +72.3% | +140.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling