+720.6%
HUT vs NIO
-64.6%
+785.2%
-65.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | -1.6% | +7.7% | +6.8% |
| 7D | +17.8% | -13.0% | +30.8% | +23.8% |
| 30D | +0.8% | -18.3% | +19.1% | +8.2% |
| 3M | -26.8% | -33.2% | +6.4% | -15.0% |
| 6M | +72.6% | -21.5% | +94.0% | +86.8% |
| YTD | +103.6% | -25.5% | +129.1% | +123.2% |
| 1Y | +265.3% | -38.0% | +303.3% | +326.7% |
| All | +720.6% | -64.6% | +785.2% | +889.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling