+501.6%
HUT vs NIO
-55.4%
+557.0%
-65.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.6% | -1.2% | +8.8% | +8.0% |
| 7D | +24.8% | -1.8% | +26.6% | +25.9% |
| 30D | -28.4% | -6.6% | -21.7% | -26.3% |
| 3M | -31.2% | -29.9% | -1.4% | -21.2% |
| 6M | -40.2% | -46.6% | +6.4% | -24.4% |
| YTD | +32.9% | -36.5% | +69.4% | +55.6% |
| 1Y | +39.1% | -51.1% | +90.2% | +79.0% |
| All | +501.6% | -55.4% | +557.0% | +660.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling