-61.1%
HTZ vs NIO
-44.5%
-16.6%
-76.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +3.4% | +5.7% | +8.6% |
| 7D | +18.9% | -0.6% | +19.5% | +18.9% |
| 30D | +26.3% | -3.5% | +29.8% | +26.9% |
| 3M | +49.7% | -30.7% | +80.3% | +52.6% |
| 6M | -61.1% | -45.6% | -15.5% | -59.6% |
| All | -61.1% | -44.5% | -16.6% | -59.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling