+49.7%
HTZ vs NIO
-30.5%
+80.2%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +3.4% | +5.7% | +8.3% |
| 7D | +18.9% | -0.6% | +19.5% | +18.7% |
| 30D | +26.3% | -3.5% | +29.8% | +27.6% |
| 3M | +49.7% | -30.7% | +80.3% | +47.0% |
| All | +49.7% | -30.5% | +80.2% | +47.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling