-61.1%
HTZ vs LNT
+2.0%
-63.1%
-76.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +2.3% | +6.9% | +9.2% |
| 7D | +18.9% | +7.2% | +11.8% | +19.4% |
| 30D | +26.3% | +15.6% | +10.6% | +29.2% |
| 3M | +49.7% | +5.2% | +44.5% | +42.4% |
| 6M | -61.1% | +1.7% | -62.8% | -63.8% |
| All | -61.1% | +2.0% | -63.1% | -63.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling