-70.6%
HTZ vs LNT
+1.3%
-72.0%
-76.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -0.4% | -20.3% | -20.8% |
| 7D | -7.7% | +4.7% | -12.4% | -7.6% |
| 30D | -13.1% | +13.0% | -26.1% | -11.7% |
| 3M | +14.7% | +5.4% | +9.3% | +9.7% |
| 6M | -70.6% | +2.0% | -72.7% | -72.7% |
| All | -70.6% | +1.3% | -72.0% | -72.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling