-74.9%
HTZ vs LNT
+59.7%
-134.6%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +2.3% | +6.9% | +8.0% |
| 7D | +18.9% | +7.2% | +11.8% | +15.0% |
| 30D | +26.3% | +15.6% | +10.6% | +17.8% |
| 3M | +49.7% | +5.2% | +44.5% | +45.6% |
| 6M | -61.1% | +1.7% | -62.8% | -62.0% |
| YTD | -56.0% | +17.0% | -73.0% | -60.7% |
| 1Y | -66.4% | +14.2% | -80.7% | -69.5% |
| All | -74.9% | +59.7% | -134.6% | -84.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling