-80.2%
HTZ vs FLNC
-73.5%
-6.7%
-85.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -20.8% | -15.9% | -4.9% | -18.7% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -16.3% | +8.6% | -5.3% |
| 30D | -13.1% | -36.6% | +23.4% | -8.0% |
| 3M | +14.7% | -64.2% | +78.9% | +29.1% |
| 6M | -70.6% | -59.9% | -10.8% | -68.2% |
| YTD | -65.2% | -74.2% | +9.1% | -61.0% |
| 1Y | -73.2% | -75.4% | +2.2% | -70.1% |
| All | -80.2% | -73.5% | -6.7% | -81.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling