-76.1%
HTZ vs FLNC
-77.5%
+1.4%
-80.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.0% | -9.1% | +1.1% | -6.9% |
| 7D | -27.5% | -10.7% | -16.8% | -26.1% |
| 30D | -21.9% | -33.9% | +12.0% | -18.4% |
| 3M | -29.2% | -61.2% | +31.9% | -23.1% |
| 6M | -75.2% | -79.7% | +4.5% | -72.0% |
| YTD | -70.8% | -75.2% | +4.4% | -66.7% |
| 1Y | -76.1% | -77.5% | +1.4% | -72.9% |
| All | -76.1% | -77.5% | +1.4% | -72.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling