-86.5%
HTZ vs DECK
-3.0%
-83.5%
-91.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +1.6% | -0.2% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -2.2% | +9.7% | +8.0% |
| 30D | +47.4% | -13.6% | +61.0% | +52.1% |
| 3M | -54.9% | -21.2% | -33.7% | -52.5% |
| 6M | -47.0% | -21.1% | -25.9% | -44.3% |
| YTD | -55.3% | -17.2% | -38.0% | -53.9% |
| 1Y | -57.6% | -30.7% | -26.9% | -54.4% |
| All | -86.5% | -3.0% | -83.5% | -85.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling