+49.7%
HTZ vs DECK
-10.7%
+60.4%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.2% | +6.0% | +3.2% | +8.2% |
| 7D | +18.9% | +10.4% | +8.6% | +18.0% |
| 30D | +26.3% | +11.1% | +15.2% | +26.6% |
| 3M | +49.7% | -10.8% | +60.4% | +25.6% |
| All | +49.7% | -10.7% | +60.4% | +25.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling