+83.8%
GTLB vs NIO
-41.9%
+125.7%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | +0.6% | -2.6% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -9.6% | +6.9% | -16.5% | -9.3% |
| 30D | -14.5% | -4.7% | -9.7% | -14.7% |
| 3M | +20.9% | -28.1% | +49.0% | +19.4% |
| All | +83.8% | -41.9% | +125.7% | +74.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling