-3.8%
GTLB vs NIO
-38.9%
+35.1%
-62.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -2.4% | +0.6% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -6.6% | -4.1% | -2.4% | -6.7% |
| 30D | +13.7% | -23.2% | +37.0% | +13.3% |
| 3M | +52.9% | -29.9% | +82.8% | +51.8% |
| 6M | +88.5% | -25.1% | +113.6% | +85.8% |
| YTD | +23.4% | -27.5% | +50.9% | +22.3% |
| 1Y | -3.8% | -41.1% | +37.3% | +0.7% |
| All | -3.8% | -38.9% | +35.1% | +0.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling