+248.5%
GLDM vs PENG
+210.5%
+38.0%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +6.4% | -7.3% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +4.5% | -5.1% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -7.1% | +11.5% | +4.5% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -27.3% | +26.2% | -0.7% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +169.6% | -183.3% | -16.0% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +164.6% | -161.9% | 0.0% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +109.5% | -84.6% | +21.9% |
| 3Y | +127.8% | +98.9% | +28.9% | +121.1% |
| 5Y | +141.1% | +116.3% | +24.9% | +131.3% |
| All | +248.5% | +210.5% | +38.0% | +230.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling