+129.7%
GLDM vs PENG
+101.4%
+28.3%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +6.4% | -7.3% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +4.5% | -5.1% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -7.1% | +11.5% | +4.5% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -27.3% | +26.2% | -0.8% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +169.6% | -183.3% | -15.3% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +164.6% | -161.9% | +0.8% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +109.5% | -84.6% | +22.5% |
| All | +129.7% | +101.4% | +28.3% | +126.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling