+103.2%
GLD vs ZTS
-51.2%
+154.4%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -3.3% | +2.5% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +4.7% | -0.4% | +5.1% | +4.7% |
| 30D | -0.9% | +11.7% | -12.6% | -1.1% |
| 3M | -4.4% | +3.5% | -7.9% | -4.5% |
| 6M | -13.6% | -27.6% | +14.1% | -12.5% |
| YTD | -6.0% | -35.5% | +29.5% | -4.3% |
| 1Y | +1.8% | -32.1% | +33.9% | +3.3% |
| 3Y | +103.2% | -49.1% | +152.3% | +113.3% |
| All | +103.2% | -51.2% | +154.4% | +113.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling