+19.4%
GLD vs ZTS
-50.8%
+70.2%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -3.0% | +1.2% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +0.7% | -4.8% | +5.5% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +0.3% | +1.2% | -0.9% | +0.3% |
| 3M | +0.6% | -6.0% | +6.6% | +0.7% |
| 6M | -15.6% | -38.7% | +23.2% | -13.4% |
| YTD | +0.9% | -40.6% | +41.5% | +3.9% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | -50.6% | +70.0% | +24.2% |
| All | +19.4% | -50.8% | +70.2% | +24.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling