+352.6%
GH vs PLTU
+154.0%
+198.6%
-33.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -9.0% | +9.2% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -13.6% | +13.5% | +1.3% |
| 30D | -1.1% | +16.7% | -17.8% | -3.6% |
| 3M | +21.3% | +29.6% | -8.3% | +14.2% |
| 6M | +73.5% | -0.1% | +73.6% | +66.0% |
| YTD | +58.0% | -31.5% | +89.5% | +56.5% |
| 1Y | +163.1% | -19.7% | +182.8% | +148.9% |
| All | +352.6% | +154.0% | +198.6% | +243.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling