+351.4%
GH vs PLTU
+142.1%
+209.3%
-33.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -4.7% | +4.4% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -2.1% | -11.6% | +9.5% | -1.0% |
| 30D | -4.5% | -4.6% | +0.2% | -4.5% |
| 3M | +28.9% | +33.7% | -4.8% | +20.6% |
| 6M | +76.5% | -9.4% | +85.9% | +70.9% |
| YTD | +57.6% | -34.7% | +92.3% | +57.0% |
| 1Y | +167.5% | -23.2% | +190.8% | +154.5% |
| All | +351.4% | +142.1% | +209.3% | +244.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling