+179.9%
GDXJ vs PLTD
-77.8%
+257.7%
-41.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | +4.6% | -7.1% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +0.2% | +5.9% | -5.8% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +17.9% | -11.6% | +29.5% | +15.8% |
| 3M | +15.3% | -29.9% | +45.2% | +10.5% |
| 6M | -9.4% | -28.5% | +19.1% | -12.2% |
| YTD | +13.4% | -20.4% | +33.8% | +11.9% |
| 1Y | +59.7% | -33.3% | +92.9% | +55.3% |
| All | +179.9% | -77.8% | +257.7% | +140.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling