+180.3%
GDXJ vs PLTD
-77.2%
+257.6%
-41.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +0.4% | +1.0% | +1.4% |
| 7D | +0.9% | -0.9% | +1.9% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +8.8% | +1.3% | +7.5% | +9.3% |
| 3M | +29.8% | -32.9% | +62.7% | +23.3% |
| 6M | -5.8% | -24.9% | +19.1% | -7.9% |
| YTD | +13.6% | -18.2% | +31.8% | +12.7% |
| 1Y | +54.5% | -28.7% | +83.2% | +51.7% |
| All | +180.3% | -77.2% | +257.6% | +142.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling