+147.4%
FTNT vs AMC
-67.9%
+215.3%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +4.3% | -4.4% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -5.8% | +2.3% | -8.2% | -5.9% |
| 30D | -4.8% | -0.7% | -4.0% | -4.8% |
| 3M | +4.4% | +35.2% | -30.8% | +2.4% |
| 6M | +88.8% | +124.6% | -35.8% | +79.9% |
| YTD | +96.8% | +69.9% | +26.9% | +89.6% |
| 1Y | +104.5% | -2.6% | +107.0% | +101.6% |
| All | +147.4% | -67.9% | +215.3% | +142.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling