+137.2%
FTNT vs AMC
-71.5%
+208.7%
-39.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | +1.9% | -4.9% | -3.1% |
| 7D | -12.7% | +2.6% | -15.3% | -12.8% |
| 30D | -37.2% | +9.0% | -46.2% | -37.5% |
| 3M | -25.8% | +22.2% | -48.0% | -26.5% |
| 6M | +32.1% | +91.5% | -59.3% | +27.0% |
| YTD | +49.7% | +101.3% | -51.6% | +42.7% |
| 1Y | +47.6% | +20.8% | +26.8% | +44.0% |
| 3Y | +137.2% | -71.3% | +208.5% | +144.2% |
| All | +137.2% | -71.5% | +208.7% | +144.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling