+96.9%
FTNT vs AMC
-12.8%
+109.7%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -3.9% | +3.7% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -6.8% | +8.6% | +2.0% |
| 30D | -4.3% | +1.7% | -5.9% | -4.2% |
| 3M | +13.6% | +26.8% | -13.2% | +11.4% |
| 6M | +87.6% | +117.7% | -30.1% | +74.3% |
| YTD | +98.0% | +57.7% | +40.3% | +87.5% |
| 1Y | +96.9% | -12.5% | +109.4% | +96.9% |
| All | +96.9% | -12.8% | +109.7% | +96.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling