-52.4%
FN vs NIO
-44.5%
-7.9%
-57.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.0% | +3.4% | -9.4% | -7.4% |
| 7D | -7.0% | -0.6% | -6.4% | -6.7% |
| 30D | -24.7% | -3.5% | -21.2% | -23.4% |
| 3M | -35.7% | -30.7% | -5.0% | -25.0% |
| 6M | -52.4% | -45.6% | -6.8% | -38.5% |
| All | -52.4% | -44.5% | -7.9% | -38.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling