+81.3%
FN vs NIO
-62.1%
+143.4%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -14.2% | -3.0% | -11.2% | -13.8% |
| 7D | -16.0% | -3.6% | -12.4% | -15.4% |
| 30D | -40.1% | -8.0% | -32.1% | -39.2% |
| 3M | -43.9% | -31.2% | -12.7% | -40.5% |
| 6M | -55.6% | -45.8% | -9.9% | -51.3% |
| YTD | -35.7% | -37.3% | +1.6% | -30.9% |
| 1Y | -39.8% | -56.1% | +16.3% | -33.4% |
| All | +81.3% | -62.1% | +143.4% | +99.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling