-51.0%
FLUT vs NIO
-92.1%
+41.0%
-75.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | +5.9% | -7.5% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -1.1% | +5.6% | -6.7% | -1.8% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -4.2% | +11.9% | +8.1% |
| 3M | -12.2% | -26.3% | +14.1% | -8.9% |
| 6M | -17.6% | -42.5% | +25.0% | -12.1% |
| YTD | -62.0% | -33.5% | -28.5% | -60.5% |
| 1Y | -62.3% | -52.7% | -9.6% | -59.1% |
| 3Y | -52.0% | -57.5% | +5.5% | -50.1% |
| All | -51.0% | -92.1% | +41.0% | -41.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling