-51.1%
FLUT vs NIO
-90.7%
+39.6%
-70.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -1.6% | -0.6% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -13.0% | +11.4% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -18.3% | +26.0% | +10.5% |
| 3M | -0.7% | -33.2% | +32.5% | +4.3% |
| 6M | -11.2% | -21.5% | +10.3% | -9.3% |
| YTD | -53.4% | -25.5% | -28.0% | -52.2% |
| 1Y | -65.8% | -38.0% | -27.8% | -64.3% |
| 3Y | -44.9% | -65.5% | +20.5% | -40.7% |
| All | -51.1% | -90.7% | +39.6% | -42.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling