-65.0%
FLUT vs NIO
-37.4%
-27.7%
-68.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -0.3% | +0.9% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -6.7% | +10.5% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +6.3% | -20.0% | +26.3% | +7.3% |
| 3M | -4.0% | -30.5% | +26.4% | -2.8% |
| 6M | -10.3% | -20.7% | +10.4% | -9.2% |
| YTD | -53.2% | -25.7% | -27.5% | -52.5% |
| 1Y | -65.0% | -38.6% | -26.5% | -63.4% |
| All | -65.0% | -37.4% | -27.7% | -63.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling