+459.9%
FCUV vs NIO
-33.7%
+493.6%
-62.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -13.7% | -1.6% | -12.1% | -10.9% |
| 7D | +62.8% | -13.0% | +75.9% | +107.3% |
| 30D | +66.5% | -18.3% | +84.8% | +137.4% |
| 3M | +459.9% | -33.2% | +493.2% | +817.9% |
| All | +459.9% | -33.7% | +493.6% | +817.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling