-97.9%
FCUV vs NIO
-53.4%
-44.5%
-98.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.1% | -1.2% | +5.3% | +4.4% |
| 7D | -4.7% | -1.8% | -2.9% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -23.2% | -6.6% | -16.5% | -21.7% |
| 3M | -49.2% | -29.9% | -19.3% | -43.6% |
| 6M | -9.2% | -46.6% | +37.4% | +6.4% |
| YTD | -90.6% | -36.5% | -54.1% | -89.7% |
| 1Y | -97.9% | -51.1% | -46.8% | -97.2% |
| All | -97.9% | -53.4% | -44.5% | -97.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling