-89.6%
FCEL vs NXT
+231.9%
-321.4%
-96.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.5% | +0.8% | +5.7% | +6.1% |
| 7D | +3.9% | -5.7% | +9.6% | +8.4% |
| 30D | -33.1% | +18.5% | -51.6% | -40.4% |
| 3M | -43.0% | -4.1% | -38.9% | -42.0% |
| 6M | -31.3% | -20.3% | -11.0% | -21.7% |
| YTD | +49.8% | +15.5% | +34.3% | +33.5% |
| 1Y | +48.2% | -5.0% | +53.1% | +46.8% |
| 3Y | -64.6% | +191.6% | -256.2% | -84.1% |
| All | -89.6% | +231.9% | -321.4% | -95.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling