-85.8%
FCEL vs NXT
+178.8%
-264.5%
-96.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -15.8% | -1.1% | -14.7% | -15.2% |
| 30D | -29.3% | -15.3% | -13.9% | -22.4% |
| 3M | -30.1% | -43.8% | +13.6% | -1.1% |
| 6M | +74.4% | -18.7% | +93.1% | +94.1% |
| YTD | +104.5% | -3.0% | +107.5% | +102.8% |
| 1Y | +281.4% | +22.7% | +258.6% | +228.3% |
| 3Y | -66.1% | +95.9% | -162.0% | -80.9% |
| All | -85.8% | +178.8% | -264.5% | -93.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling