-60.3%
FCEL vs NXT
+89.5%
-149.8%
-93.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.7% | -3.6% | -3.1% | -4.6% |
| 7D | +15.1% | -0.2% | +15.3% | +15.5% |
| 30D | -16.4% | -20.0% | +3.5% | -4.9% |
| 3M | -5.3% | -30.9% | +25.7% | +19.6% |
| 6M | +124.5% | -23.8% | +148.3% | +160.8% |
| YTD | +126.7% | -5.4% | +132.1% | +128.8% |
| 1Y | +219.9% | +28.0% | +191.8% | +173.0% |
| All | -60.3% | +89.5% | -149.8% | -80.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling