+181.1%
EQT vs FLNC
-70.4%
+251.4%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +2.5% | -4.1% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -4.1% | +2.1% | -1.8% |
| 30D | 0.0% | -24.8% | +24.8% | +1.6% |
| 3M | +5.9% | -59.1% | +65.0% | +11.1% |
| 6M | -14.8% | -42.0% | +27.2% | -14.2% |
| YTD | +1.8% | -49.8% | +51.6% | +2.3% |
| 1Y | +7.4% | +43.1% | -35.7% | -2.7% |
| 3Y | +33.6% | -61.0% | +94.6% | +27.2% |
| All | +181.1% | -70.4% | +251.4% | +167.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling