+35.8%
EQT vs FLNC
-63.7%
+99.6%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -4.2% | +4.9% | +0.8% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -5.0% | +3.8% | -1.0% |
| 30D | +1.1% | -26.1% | +27.2% | +2.3% |
| 3M | +4.8% | -55.2% | +60.0% | +7.9% |
| 6M | -10.6% | -42.6% | +32.0% | -10.1% |
| YTD | +3.4% | -51.0% | +54.5% | +3.9% |
| 1Y | +8.7% | +43.3% | -34.7% | +0.1% |
| All | +35.8% | -63.7% | +99.6% | +34.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling