+39.0%
ENTG vs LDOS
+39.7%
-0.7%
-56.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +0.5% | +5.6% | +6.0% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -5.4% | +8.2% | +4.2% |
| 30D | -4.7% | +4.9% | -9.6% | -6.1% |
| 3M | -0.7% | +7.2% | -7.9% | -2.1% |
| 6M | +7.7% | -24.2% | +32.0% | +19.7% |
| YTD | +65.1% | -25.8% | +90.9% | +83.0% |
| 1Y | +74.8% | -24.7% | +99.5% | +92.4% |
| All | +39.0% | +39.7% | -0.7% | +26.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling