+49.8%
ENTG vs LDOS
-31.2%
+81.0%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -2.3% | +4.9% | +2.2% |
| 7D | -17.1% | -7.2% | -9.9% | -17.9% |
| 30D | -23.0% | +16.8% | -39.8% | -21.5% |
| 3M | -10.2% | -1.6% | -8.6% | -9.5% |
| 6M | -17.8% | -1.0% | -16.8% | -13.6% |
| YTD | +52.4% | -25.8% | +78.1% | +62.2% |
| 1Y | +49.8% | -31.1% | +80.9% | +69.5% |
| All | +49.8% | -31.2% | +81.0% | +69.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling