+16.2%
ENTG vs HTZ
-85.9%
+102.1%
-59.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.2% | +1.3% | +4.8% | +5.9% |
| 7D | +2.8% | +7.5% | -4.6% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -4.7% | +47.4% | -52.1% | -11.6% |
| 3M | -0.7% | -54.9% | +54.2% | +8.4% |
| 6M | +7.7% | -47.0% | +54.7% | +13.1% |
| YTD | +65.1% | -55.3% | +120.3% | +77.9% |
| 1Y | +74.8% | -57.6% | +132.4% | +86.5% |
| 3Y | +36.9% | -86.6% | +123.5% | +83.1% |
| All | +16.2% | -85.9% | +102.1% | +66.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling