+46.6%
ENTG vs HTZ
-82.6%
+129.2%
-56.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -8.0% | +6.9% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -9.3% | -27.5% | +18.2% | -6.1% |
| 30D | -16.4% | -21.9% | +5.5% | -14.4% |
| 3M | -3.8% | -29.2% | +25.4% | -1.1% |
| 6M | -6.9% | -75.2% | +68.3% | +5.0% |
| YTD | +65.0% | -70.8% | +135.8% | +81.2% |
| 1Y | +61.7% | -76.1% | +137.8% | +80.9% |
| 3Y | +46.6% | -82.5% | +129.2% | +71.9% |
| All | +46.6% | -82.6% | +129.2% | +71.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling