+42.1%
ENTG vs HTZ
-82.6%
+124.7%
-56.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -8.4% | +11.0% | +3.5% |
| 7D | -17.1% | -14.6% | -2.5% | -15.7% |
| 30D | -23.0% | -20.8% | -2.2% | -21.3% |
| 3M | -10.2% | -18.8% | +8.6% | -9.0% |
| 6M | -17.8% | -74.7% | +56.9% | -7.4% |
| YTD | +52.4% | -68.1% | +120.5% | +65.8% |
| 1Y | +49.8% | -73.5% | +123.3% | +65.7% |
| 3Y | +42.1% | -81.8% | +123.9% | +67.5% |
| All | +42.1% | -82.6% | +124.7% | +67.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling