+65.7%
ENTG vs HTZ
-60.6%
+126.4%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.5% | +9.2% | -15.7% | -7.7% |
| 7D | -10.3% | +18.9% | -29.3% | -12.6% |
| 30D | -14.4% | +26.3% | -40.6% | -17.9% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +49.7% | -50.8% | -9.0% |
| 6M | +3.0% | -61.1% | +64.1% | +18.8% |
| YTD | +70.1% | -56.0% | +126.1% | +82.8% |
| 1Y | +65.7% | -66.4% | +132.2% | +107.5% |
| All | +65.7% | -60.6% | +126.4% | +107.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling